(V12) 1 CLR 70A

1926 May 12

 

Appeal No. 3118.

[NETTLETON, C.J. AND DICKINSON, P.J.]

MICHAEL HAJI CHRISTOFI

v.

LOIZO CHRISTOFI ECONOMOU

HAJI YORGHI ANDONI HAJI CONSTANTI (Ex parte).

Hajipetrou for Appellant (Defendant).

Loizou for Respondent (Plaintiff).

No appearance for Ex-parte.

Appeal by defendant from an order of a single District Court Judge direct to the Supreme Court-Consent of all parties not obtained-Civil Procedure Law, 1885, section 96.-Rules of Court Order XXI., rule 8 and 9.

HELD: Unless there is consent of all parties affected an appeal will not lie to the Supreme Court from the order of a single Judge of a District Court. Civil Procedure Law, 1885, section 96.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

---

cylaw.org: Από το ΚΙΝOΠ/CyLii για τον Παγκύπριο Δικηγορικό Σύλλογο