ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΔΙΚΗΓΟΡΙΚΟΣ ΣΥΛΛΟΓΟΣ
|
Δεν έχει εντοπιστεί νομοθεσία ή απόφαση ή δικονομικός θεσμός στον οποίο να κάνει αναφορά η απόφαση αυτή
Μεταγενέστερη νομολογία η οποία κάνει αναφορά στην απόφαση αυτή:
Δεν έχει εντοπιστεί απόφαση η οποία να κάνει αναφορά στην απόφαση αυτή
(V12) 1 CLR 54
1925 June 30
[DICKINSON, ACTING C.J. AND VERGETTE, ACTING P.J.]
POLICE
v.
YANGOS G. DEMIRDJI.
PREVIOUS TRIAL AND CONVICTION SET ASIDE FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION NO BAR TO FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Accused was brought before a Magisterial Court charged with several offenses, one of which was for assaulting the Police in the execution of their duty. He consented to be tried summarily and was convicted of some of the lesser offences and sentenced. He appealed from that conviction and sentence, and the Supreme Court quashed the conviction for want of jurisdiction and discharged the accused. The Police now prefer a new set of charges on the same matters.
Resjudicata was pleaded, and although the Magistrate himself was satisfied he matter was not resjudicata, he stated a case for the Supreme Court, asking if the former proceedings amounted to resjudicata.
For Police the Assistant Attorney-General.
For Accused Triantafyllides.
Judgment: From the notes of the Chief Justice in the former proceedings we see the Supreme Court then ruled that as the proceedings before the Magisterial Court were a nullity they formed no bar to an institution of fresh proceedings for the same offences.
We therefore reply to the question raised-the original proceedings do not amount to resjudicata and form no bar to fresh proceedings for the same offences.